天易网

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1952|回复: 2

法治的基本原则

[复制链接]
发表于 11/26/2010 02:01:25 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
本帖最后由 郭国汀 于 2010-11-26 01:07 编辑

        
                                                               
“法治要求人们根据已知的,具有普遍适用性的固定规则来管理国家。如果要求人民遵守法治,那么法律就应当是众所周知的(至少是可知的);假如期望人民能够妥善安排他们的生活,那么法律(包括寻些怎样修改法律的规则)就必须是恒定的;最后,假使要真正做到法律面前人人平等,那么法律就必须是普遍适用的。”

法治的基本原则

郭国汀

法治到底有那几项基本原则?古今中外法学家们从未有过公认一致的结论,不同时期不同国家的法学家各有所见,有些主张大同小异有些则相差甚大。事实上,法治概念与所有其他概念一样,都是渐渐发展完善的。例如:

首创“法治”一词的英国着名法学家戴西认为:“法治有三层含义:一是任何人均不得因法律未明文禁止的行为,而受到惩罚或支付赔偿;[1]二是每个人的法律权利和自由均得由普通法院决定;[2]三是每个人的个人权利均源于英国的共同法,而非源于一部成文宪法,因此,英国宪法乃是法院通常作用的产物,而非法院管辖权的渊源”。[3]亦即戴西之法治原则是指法无明文不为罪即罪行法定原则,法院裁断是非的最终决定权;及习惯法高于成文法。这显然与现代法学界公认的法治之“法律面前人人平等”的首要原则及法律恒定性,普遍适用性与可知性法治原则有重大区别。

海瓦德(Heward)勋爵特别强调法治的三项原则:除非经普通法院法官和培审团依法定程序审理确认违法事实,任何人不得被非法拘禁,惩罚或判处损害赔偿;每个人,无论其地位如何,均受国家共同法律的管辖,且均应对其违反法律的任何行为按照普通法院(民事和刑事)承担个人责任;任何人不得以他的违法行事是因服从上级的命令为由有效抗辩。[4]这里海瓦德首先强调的是“正当程序原则”;其次,实质强调“恶法非法原则”;第三“法律面前人人平等原则”。

约瑟夫(Joseph R归纳法治原则如下[5]1法律应该是可预期而非溯及既往的(可知性);2法律应当稳定而不能经常变更,因为若不了解法律内容,将妨碍人们受法律的指导(恒定性);3定法律应当有清晰的规则和程序(立法符合程序性);4必须保障司法官的独立(法官独立审判权)5当遵守自然正义的原则,尤其那些关于公正审理听证的权利(法律公正正义性);6法庭应当有对其他原则执行情况的司法审查的权力(法院最终裁定性);7法庭应当是可接近的,任何人不得被拒绝正义(法院向全体公民平等开放);8、控制罪行防范机构的执法自由决定权以防其滥用法律”(限制法官自由决定权)。[6]

富勒认为法治原则包括:法律的普遍性众所周知,不得溯及既往,明确清晰连贯性,可行性(不得要求不可能的事),恒久性,以及在公布的规则与官员行为之间完全相符。[7]

贝尔顿( Kleinfeld Belton)认为“虽然未确立对所有实践均适用的法治的定义,但该基本领域有共同原则。他确法治有如下五项原则:

1政府受法律制约和统治2法律面前人人平等3。法律和秩序的建立;4。正义的有效和可预测的适用;5。人权的保护”。[8]

治的三项伟大原则乃是:法律的普遍性立法权至上司法和行政行为的合法性”。[9]


“法治成为共同法的基本原则。其最基本的形式即为法律面前的平等,公正和正义”[10]

综合上述法学家们提出的18项法治原则可以归纳成如下五类

·
涉及立法机构的有三项:立法至上原则、立法与执法正当程序原则、习惯法至上原则;

·
涉及法律立法技术程序正义者有三项:罪行法定原则、法律可知性原则、法律恒定性原则;

·
涉及法院权能的有四项:法院最终决定权原则、法院司法审查权原则、法官独立原则、限制法官任意决定权原则;

·
涉及法律公正实体正义者有四项:恶法非法原则;司法合法性原则;自然正义原则;公正和正义原则;此四项原则可归纳为法律正义性原则。

·
涉及法律适用对象者有:法律面前人人平等原则、政府(总统)受法律约束原则、法律普遍适用性原则、公民可诉至法院原则、人权保护原则。前三项实质上同属法律面前人人平等。

据此可见法治观分为广义与狭义两类:广义的法治观包括程序和实体正义原则,而狭义的法治观仅含程序正义原则。我认为美国Puget大学桑德法学院吉姆斯旁德教授对法治的论述彼为经典“法治要求人们根据已知的,具有普遍适用性的固定规则来管理国家。如果要求人民遵守法治,那么法律就应当是众所周知的(至少是可知的);假如期望人民能够妥善安排他们的生活,那么法律(包括寻些怎样修改法律的规则)就必须是恒定的;最后,假使要真正做到法律面前人人平等,那么法律就必须是普遍适用的。”[11]亦即旁德教授归纳的法治四原则乃是法律的可知性、普遍性、和恒定性和法律面前人人平等。如果再加上法律正义性原则,和可诉性原则更趋于完善。因为单纯程序正义意义上的法治原则,无法保证法律本身的正义性,也无法确保受害公民的诉权。共产党国体制下正由于法律正义性和可诉性的严重缺位,进一步使得根本没有法治生存的馀地。而所有的自由社会都是建立在相同的法治基础之上的。在某种意义上说,法治原则甚至高于民主原则。因为凡是法治健全的社会,公民的基本人权和自由皆有起码的保障;凡是没有法治或法治不彰的社会,公民既无自由,人权也决无法律保障。

2010531日第222个反中共极权专制暴政争自由人权民主绝食争权抗暴民权运动日




[1] See A.V. A.V. Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law ofthe Constitution,179-201 (7th ed. 1908)(the Rule of Law in England).at 183. As Dicey defined it, the Rule of Law had three meanings in England。1) no one can be made to suffer punishment or to pay damages for any conductnot definitely forbidden by law; (2) everyone's legal rights and liabilitiesare determined by the ordinary courts of the realm; and (3)everyone's individual rights are derived from the ordinary law of the land, not from awritten constitution, so that the English Constitution is the product of the ordinaryfunctioning of the courts and not the source of the courts' jurisdiction

[2] See A.V. Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of theConstitution, 179-201 (7th ed. 1908) (the Rule of Law in England). at 189.

[3] See A.V. A.V. Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law ofthe Constitution,179-201 (7th ed. 1908)(the Rule of Law in England). at 191.

[4]The Rt. Hon. Lord Hewart of Bury, The New Despotism (Benn,1929) at 26-27. Hewart explained what he meant by the Rule of Law. His account,drawing heavily on Dicey, is unexceptional. He emphasised three principles inparticular: that no one can lawfully be restrained or punished or condemned indamages save for a violation of the lawestablished to the satisfaction of a judge or jury in proceedings regularlyinstituted in one of the ordinary courts; that everyone, whatever his position,is governed by the ordinary law of the land and personally liable for anythingdone by him contrary to that law, being subject to the ordinary courts, civiland criminal; and that no one charged with a violation of the law mayeffectively plead, in any court, that his act was done in obedience to the commandof any superior.

[5] Joseph Raz's principles of rule of law are as follows: •That laws should be prospective rather than retroactive. • Laws should bestable and not changed too frequently, as lack of awareness of the law preventsone from being guided by it. • There should be clear rules and procedures formaking laws. • The independence of the judiciary has to be guaranteed. • Theprinciples of natural justice should be observed, particularly those concerningthe right to a fair hearing. • The courts should have the power to judicialreview the way in which the other principles are implemented. • The courtsshould be accessible; no man may be denied justice. • The discretion of lawenforcement and crime prevention agencies should not be allowed to pervert thelaw.

[6] 另一作者归纳Joseph Raz法治原则如下:"TheRule of Law and Its Virtue" in The Authority Law, (Oxford: ClarendonPress. 1979 at 214-18.) (1 prospectivity, publicityand clarity; (2) stability; (3) making of particular laws and orders should beguided by public, stable, clear general rules; (4) independence of thejudiciary; (5) conformity to natural justice (due process considerations suchas fair hearing by unbiased tribunal) (6) judicial review (limited to ensuringconformity to rule of law); (7) easy accessibility to courts; and (8) controlof discretion of crime-preventing agencies so that the law is not perverted.- JosephRaz's list, which he considers incomplete, is: (1)预期性,公开性和明确性;(2)稳定性;(3)制定特定的法律或命令应当受公开,稳定,清晰的一般原则指导;(4)司法独立;(5)与自然正义相符(正当程序考虑诸如由公正的法庭公正审理);(6)司法审查(限制并确保符合法治);(7)容易诉诸法院;(8)控制犯罪防范机构的自由决定权以防法律被滥用。

[7] Lon Fuller, The Morality of Law (New Haven: Yale UniversityPress. 1964) at 41-44.)principles or precepts of the rule of law. LonFuller's list has been rightly influential: generality of law. promulgation.non-retroactivity, clarity, consistency of laws, not requiring the impossible,constancy of law through time, and congruence between official action anddeclared rule;

[8] while there is no set definition of the rule of lawencompassing all its practices, there is a basic realm of common principles.The scholar Rachel Kleinfeld Belton identifies five: 1. a government bound byand ruled by law; 2. equality before the law; 3. the establishment of law andorder; 4. the efficient and predictable application of justice; and 5. theprotection of human rights.

[9] the three great principles of the Rule of Law are thegenerality of law, the supremacy of the legislative power, and the legality ofadjudication and administrative action.

[10] Barrie J.Saxton & Ronald T.Stansfield, UnderstandingCriminal Offences, Carswell 1996.P.3. the rule of law become a fundamentalprinciple of the common law. in its most basic form the rule of law meansequality, fairness, and justice before the law.

[11] JamesE.Bood, The Art of Judgment(New Brunswick and London 1987) 《审判的艺术》郭国汀译(中国政法大学出版社,1994P19



        
 楼主| 发表于 1/4/2017 18:42:31 | 显示全部楼层
The root of the rule of law buries in religion, where the natural law or the God law is above any King or Queen's power. The creator creates anything of course including the law while King and Queen are not the creator but be created, thus they must under the law, not above them. The communist regime for their utterly destroy religious faith, at meantime root out the spirit of the rule of law.
 楼主| 发表于 2/8/2018 18:54:28 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 郭国汀 于 2/8/2018 19:21 编辑

The basic notion of the rule of law is the distinction be-
tween the "rule of law" and the "rule of men"--that is, that the
law is distinct from the will and desires of the king.
     [The doctrine of the rule of law means first "the absolute
     supremacy or predominance of regular law as opposed to the
     influence of arbitrary power, and excludes the influence of
     arbitrariness of prerogative, or even of wide discretionary
     authority on the part of government;" and secondly it means
     "equality before the law, or the equal subjection of all classes
     to the ordinary law of the land administered by the ordinary
     law courts."[1]
The rule of law
"is contrasted with every system of government based on the
exercise by persons in authority of wide, arbitrary, or discre-
          tionary powers of constraint."[2]"

Criminal defendants are presumed to be innocent until proven guilty.
The bill of attainder clause in the Constitution prohibits the
legislature from passing a law which names individuals and
imposes penalties on them, while the ex post facto clause pro-
hibits the legislature from passing a law which punishes indi-
viduals retroactively for acts which did not violate any explicit
           law at the time they were committed."[3]


[1] 10 WILLIAM HOLDSWORTH, A HISTORY OF ENGLISH LAW 649 (1938)。
[2] ALBERT VENN DICEY, INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF THE LAW OF THE CONSTITUTION 188 (7th ed. 1908)
[3] See U.S. CONST. art. I, § 9, cl. 3 ("No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.").
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则


站内文章仅为网友提供更多信息,不代表本网站同意其说法或描述,也不构成任何建议。本网站仅为网友提供交流平台,对网友自由上传的文字和图片等,本网站
不为其版权和内容等负责。站内部分内容转载自其它社区、论坛或各种媒体,有些原作者未知。如您认为站内的某些内容属侵权,请及时与我们联络并进行处理。
关于我们|隐私政策|免责条款|版权声明|网站导航|帮助中心
道至大 道天成

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|联系我们|天易综合网 (Twitter@wolfaxcom)

GMT-5, 8/20/2018 21:29 , Processed in 0.187275 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On.

Copyright 天易网 network. All Rights Reserved.

© 2009-2015 .

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表